The three movies so far have not really included material from the other books. At least, not so that I noticed.halfbreeds_rule
PS: I think they squished in the other books they didn't cover into the movies that they made.
I liked Blade Runner the movie a lot more than the book it was based on; I agree they were very different. Have you read the sequel by K. W. Jeter? (Blade Runner 2) It seemed to me much more a continuation of the movie than the original book, but I didn't really like it and didn't bother reading Blade Runner 3 when it came out though I may get around to it one day.there are many films which are extremely unfaithful to their source material, and yet, they are amongst my all time favourite movies... "Blade Runner"
Wanderer
Certainly, I would've still been irritated by some of the acting, especially the laziness of Ben Barnes' performance, I did notice that the man couldn't be bothered with doing an accent this time round for some reason...Surely the director would've had the last say (if not the first say) on that decision? Whatever the background it was just weird.
They did develop the cousin Eustace and be turning him into a dragon made him mature and had its purose. I truly don't believe they did that just to add some special featuresEustace as dragon was in the book; if anything I thought the movie didn't explain how it happened and how Aslan fixed it anywhere near as well as in the book.
Actually it was more scary because of the firey writing, and at first I thought the message said "I ATE EUSTACE" :P *facepalms*